Tip: Select
a length for advanced search!
| ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expand? | Letters | Answer | Clue | |||||
95% | 11 | Exact Match! | ||||||
noun • feather growing from the tail (uropygium) of a bird | ||||||||
34% | 7 | Thin, feather-like projection on a bird's feather | ||||||
No meanings yet for this word...
| ||||||||
29% | 12 | The narrow, pointed outer segments of the feather of a bird | ||||||
No meanings yet for this word...
| ||||||||
A Long Narrow Feather At The Rear Of A Bird
There is 1 exact and 136 possible answers.
We've checked our database and we believe the answer to be
TAIL FEATHER with a confidence score of 95%.
Check other possible answers below.
Check other possible answers below.
We're 95% sure the answer is
TAIL FEATHER
Best Possible Answers
How's It Work?
Our Data
Our database consists of millions of crossword clues, anagrams, synonyms and more. We have over 9 million crossword clues with answers, 5 million synonyms and over 10 million anagrams. We also keep track of popular crosswords such as the New York Times(NYT) with the dates and answers for your convenience.
Even if we don't have the clue in our database, we can still find the answer for you. Simply filter by number of letters and enter any characters that you know of, and our algorithm will return any matching words or phrases.
Alternatively you can use our Known Letters Finder Tool
Similar Clues
Clue | Source | |
---|---|---|
1 | Causes of some rear-end damage, as represented by the rear ends of 18-, 22-, 38- and 58-Across
New York Times -
31 Jul 2012 | New York Times / 31 Jul 2012 |
2 | Rear's rear?
New York Times -
16 Apr 2011 | New York Times / 16 Apr 2011 |
3 | Rear admiral's rear
New York Times -
07 Jun 2013 | New York Times / 07 Jun 2013 |
4 | Rear for rear
New York Times -
30 Mar 2000 | New York Times / 30 Mar 2000 |
5 | The narrow, pointed outer segments of the feather of a bird | |
6 | Thin, feather-like projection on a bird's feather | |
7 | To the rear, to a rear admiral
New York Times -
31 May 2003 | New York Times / 31 May 2003 |